C-Cue ?
Ribble me this [!]
[Just in ! ]
Showing posts with label Sabbatical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sabbatical. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Segue/Sabbatical
Steel on Wheels Dylan Ratigan.
Rahm Rhetoric on going to waste.
Hardball Politics of them and us.
I will leave this post with this and rest as to reads for further thumbing.
The Steel on Wheels and Hardball are two MSNBC linguistic references(to be links) to a Genre Clash or Segue Slash between disciplines*. Ratigan and Business for the People, and Matthews and Political Partisan strategies of conflict.
* not to mention Apostles and Ledership
[YES! as I recall. Well I may have made to much of a leap here but, I think that Obama should be making the most of the Wiscsonsin Waterloo for the Republican Strategy.
Rahm Rhetoric on going to waste.
Hardball Politics of them and us.
I will leave this post with this and rest as to reads for further thumbing.
The Steel on Wheels and Hardball are two MSNBC linguistic references(to be links) to a Genre Clash or Segue Slash between disciplines*. Ratigan and Business for the People, and Matthews and Political Partisan strategies of conflict.
* not to mention Apostles and Ledership
[YES! as I recall. Well I may have made to much of a leap here but, I think that Obama should be making the most of the Wiscsonsin Waterloo for the Republican Strategy.
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Ground Zero & Logical Relativism?
[Please note that I stumbled upon this link 2-13-11 and believe it may have been held in draft]
OK, I will not expound upon whatever my headline means, except for this poll.
But have we learned anything from the Shirley Sherrod episode?
Others have a more nuanced stand, while Keith Olbermann attempts some perspective.
[Nuanced footnote: Grounds: Zero?. And yet, I can support* Harry Reid's statement, realizing he may know the difference which Republicans don't, basically like Chris Hayes does not support The National Review, but does not intend to ban it. It seems to hinge(or spin) on freedom and opportunity.
* I am using the word "support", which Hayes says is not the right word, but I use it in the Right's context. All words are nuanced or in context, which disconnects** many from the cause and effect of nature and progress, let alone values or taste.]
** note: emphasis bold links, and anachronism of last two
OK, I will not expound upon whatever my headline means, except for this poll.
But have we learned anything from the Shirley Sherrod episode?
Others have a more nuanced stand, while Keith Olbermann attempts some perspective.
[Nuanced footnote: Grounds: Zero?. And yet, I can support* Harry Reid's statement, realizing he may know the difference which Republicans don't, basically like Chris Hayes does not support The National Review, but does not intend to ban it. It seems to hinge(or spin) on freedom and opportunity.
* I am using the word "support", which Hayes says is not the right word, but I use it in the Right's context. All words are nuanced or in context, which disconnects** many from the cause and effect of nature and progress, let alone values or taste.]
** note: emphasis bold links, and anachronism of last two
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)